Digital Blog
Startups

Canva AI pivot: 4 senior exits in a single month

Four senior leaders left Canva in May 2026 as the design giant races to become AI-native, testing its promise to redeploy staff rather than replace them.

By Jules Hartman6 min read
Canva headquarters exterior with brand signage

In May, as Canva paused all normal operations so its 5,300 employees could spend a week doing nothing but learn artificial intelligence, chief people officer Jennie Rogerson offered a disarmingly direct assessment. “Any job is an evolution, and AI has just sped up that evolution,” she told the Sydney Morning Herald. “Yes, the work that you do today may be automated.”

It was the kind of admission rarely heard from inside a company building toward an initial public offering. But at Australia’s most valuable private technology group — now valued at roughly $US39 billion ($59 billion) — the passage from design platform to AI-native powerhouse is proving more turbulent than the product launch stages suggest.

Four senior leaders departed Canva in May alone. Iain Dowling, who led growth for eight years and helped the company sail past 200 million monthly users, resigned. Jonathan Ross, a senior engineering director, also left. Their exits followed a Canva Create 2026 event in April at Los Angeles’ SoFi Stadium — a spectacle of musical acts, celebrity appearances, and sweeping AI product demonstrations — that the Australian Financial Review later described as asking whether Canva was offering “a certificate for burnout” to its own workforce.

The confetti and the churn

Canva co-founder and COO Cliff Obrecht was blunt about the pressure inside the organisation. “The pace of change is unlike anything I’ve seen before,” he said, “and the teams learning fastest are the ones getting hands-on.” The implication was clear: adapt quickly, or adapt out.

That pressure is landing at the top. Dowling and Ross were not isolated exits; the four departures in a single month at a company of Canva’s scale mark a level of senior churn unusual for a pre-IPO group projecting stability. The company has also quietly tightened backfilling — not announcing layoffs, but allowing headcount to contract through natural attrition. It is a softer form of workforce management that avoids the headlines Atlassian and WiseTech drew when they cut staff, but it moves in the same direction.

The pace of change is unlike anything I’ve seen before, and the teams learning fastest are the ones getting hands-on.
— Cliff Obrecht, Canva co-founder and COO

Redeploy, don’t replace — a harder promise

Canva has publicly committed to a philosophy its rivals have not matched: redeploy staff into new AI-shaped roles rather than eliminate them. It is a more humane promise, and it distinguishes Canva from the broader wave of AI-fuelled headcount reductions across Australian technology. Atlassian cut jobs in 2025 citing AI productivity and subsequently fell off LinkedIn’s ranking of Australia’s best tech employers. WiseTech and Block have trimmed roles while automating workflows.

But keeping the redeploy promise at scale is a different challenge than stating it. Canva’s headcount ballooned from roughly 1,000 to more than 4,000 during the pandemic-era design boom — a glut of hiring that left the company layered in roles that AI-fuelled productivity now threatens. Rogerson’s people team frames the shift as an evolution, not an extinction. “We want to train you for the next work,” she said. Whether the roles needed at the end of that training are the roles people already hold is the open question.

A team collaborating on a design project in a modern creative workspace

A week of learning, a year of proving it

The centrepiece of Canva’s workforce strategy is AI Discovery Week, held for the second time in May. All 5,300 employees halted normal work for five days of hands-on AI experimentation. They logged 26,000 hours of exploration, generated 467 hackathon ideas — up from 330 in 2025 — and drove daily usage of Canva’s internal AI tools up 110 per cent. The legal team built an AI Slack bot that saved 1,500 hours on trademark checks. Ninety per cent of staff are already weekly or daily AI users.

Those numbers are the external story. The internal one is more complicated. A Fortune op-ed by a Canva executive acknowledged the real bottleneck was not the technology but human behaviour — what the company calls the “behaviour gap” between access to AI tools and meaningful adoption of them in daily workflows. The gap raises a question the dashboards cannot answer: when the structured week ends, does the behaviour stick, or do old habits return?

There’s space to be both nervous and excited at the same time.
— Jose Gato, Canva employee

The front-row product play

On the product side, Canva’s ambition is genuinely large. In the past quarter it executed what Fast Company called a “frontier model clean sweep,” integrating with Google’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and Microsoft’s Copilot. Its conversational design agent lets users describe what they want in natural language and receive a completed design. Anwar Haneef, a Canva general manager, told Fast Company the integration targeted the gap between AI output and brand-ready asset.

The biggest friction in AI-powered creative work for companies has always been the gap between AI output and brand-ready asset.
— Anwar Haneef, Canva general manager

But the strategy carries a risk of its own. If every design tool connects to every AI model, switching costs thin out, and differentiation shifts from access to execution. Google has declared itself a contender in AI design. Adobe’s Firefly AI assistant is iterating quickly. Anthropic’s Claude Design is emerging as a native alternative. In a recent review, The Verge called Adobe’s conversational agent “a mediocre design intern” but observed that Canva’s own agent was “rife with tendencies to communicate through flowery language.” The battleground is crowded, and nobody holds a durable lead.

A dual-monitor design workspace with creative software open in a dimly lit studio

The IPO shadow

For the public-market debut that has hovered over Canva’s strategy for years, getting the AI story right is existential. The AFR reported in April that the AI pivot is a make-or-break bet tied directly to the company’s valuation ambitions. An integrated, AI-native Canva that demonstrates enterprise-grade workflow automation can tell a very different story to public-market investors than a design-tool company with AI features bolted on.

Canva earned the sixth spot on LinkedIn’s 2026 ranking of Australia’s best tech companies for career growth — a credential that matters when you are asking 5,300 people to fundamentally change how they work and accept that some of what they do today may not exist tomorrow. “Redeploy, don’t replace” is a more humane promise than what the rest of the sector is offering. But the four leaders who walked out the door in May did not wait to find out if it would hold. For those who stayed, the confetti has settled and the work of rewiring Australia’s biggest startup is only beginning.

AdobeAtlassiancanvaCliff ObrechtJennie RogersonMelanie Perkins
Jules Hartman

Jules Hartman

Startup reporter tracking the Sydney–Melbourne ecosystem, raises, and exits. Reports from Surry Hills.

Related